![]() |
| Three volumes of the Buchbinderlehrling showing variations in reinforcement placement. All bindings presumably by apprentices. From left: 1930, 1938, 1941. |

Variations on reinforcement placement on the Edelpappband.
The one at bottom right is the original, with invisible corners.
With industrialization, the structure was also adapted for case bindings, evolving with changes to the trade, the industrial revolution, and the needs of customers. Increasing discussions of the Pappband and its future began to appear in the trade journals in the early years of the 20th century. These discussions, largely between Paul Adam (Teacher, author, and editorial voice of the Archiv für Buchbinderei) and Paul Kersten (perhaps the leading binder and author of the time) continued across numerous articles. Was the Pappband still relevant? Among the concerns were its “archaic” structure and “lack of durability”. These were accompanied by calls to go back to its roots, i.e. covering in parchment[5] or cloth, even if just as half-bindings to take advantage of all the new and innovative decorated papers being developed.[6] But, is a quarter-cloth or quarter-leather binding still a Pappband?
Forwarding these bindings would have been largely similar: hooked endsheets, later tipped-on, with or without a guard or waste sheet; sewing on recessed cords or tapes, frayed out, or stapled through mull or similar; square or rounded spine backed to 45°; stuck on or sewn endbands … As always, there were variations in these details, based on the binder’s preferences, habit, or the nature of the book …
The first mention of what is now referred to as the Edelpappband can be found in L[udwig] Brades’ Illustriertes Buchbinderbuch (1904), with the suggestion to reinforce the head and tail of the spine as well as corners with parchment, especially on heavier books. The paper covering was cut to expose 3 mm or less of the parchment reinforcement.[7] In 1909, Paul Kersten described this structure, addressing the concerns about its durability. He described reinforcing the Pappband’s most vulnerable areas at head and tail and the corners with parchment, while still covering the case overall with paper. The paper would be cut out at the head and tail so that only a millimeter of the parchment showed, and the corners would be invisible on the outside of the boards. The result was a binding that had a better “marketing value” and was worth the extra cost.
An editorial rebuttal of Kersten’s article took issue with the increased inefficiencies and cost of this “reinforced” Pappband, also stating that the structure was behind the times. What would English binders think of this structure when handling an example?[8] This sentiment was also expressed in other articles. At this time, German binding was considered not on par with French and English binding, something that was acknowledged by the German Court bookbinder W. Collin.[9]
Binders began to show greater interest in both this “reinforced” Pappband and the fully-paper-covered Pappband (also referred to as a Papierband), especially during the First World War and during the economic and political chaos that followed, something reflected in the literature . In bookbinding, wartime austerity measures meant shortages, including fewer skins for leather and parchment, but an increase in the variety of decorated papers and their use. “Good” conditions for the Pappband. It is during this time that Sandgren was working as a binder and studying in Berlin.
![]() |
| Ad for the New Testament as an Edelpappband describing reinforcement at head/tail and corners. In Zwiebelfisch, vol 10, 1919. |
![]() |
| Extract from an article in the Börsenblatt für den deutschen Buchhandel, 19 April, 1919, urging book purchasers to examine the items in person, especially in this time of the Edelpappband and other Ersatz products. Quality was a concern around publishers' bindings ... |
So, where did the term Edelpappband, loosely translated as “noble” paper binding, originate? In his memoirs, Hermann Nitz describes coining the term to describe a “reinforced” trade paper-covered binding during the First World War. Nitz was a fine binder who was promoted to operations manager at Spamer, one of the largest trade binderies in Leipzig. This case binding had strips of parchment at the head and tail of the spine (as well as invisible corners), as was common in craft-/hand-bookbinding versions. The decorated paper was die-cut. For larger editions, or when parchment and leather became unavailable, book cloth and other materials came into use. To Nitz, Edelpappband was an appropriate term because of the structure’s combination of reinforcement and the ability to show off the new and innovative decorated papers that were created during that time.[11] An essay by the Fritzsche A.G., another large trade bindery, described how the Edelpappband was an outgrowth of the increasingly symbiotic relationship between the extra- and publishers binding departments of these large binderies. The greater strength of the Edelpappband, and its attractiveness as a platform for the new decorated papers, justified its increased cost. It was not designed to replace traditional quarter-, half-, or full-leather trade bindings, or compete with hand-bindings.[12]
![]() |
| Descriptions of binding types from the Börsenblatt für den deutschen Buchhandel, 17 March, 1938. In regards to the Edelpappband it writes that the most vulnerable parts of the binding, i.e. head and tail as well as corners are reinforced with parchment, leather, or bookcloth. These are not just a technical improvement, but also aesthetic details that enhance the binding. |
![]() |
| Variety in reinforcement placement from Rhein (1953). See below for more. |
Thank you to my early "readers" Kyle Clark and Jay Tanner. as well as Emily Bell at the GBW Newsletter for her thoughtful edits. Thanks also to Renate Mesmer for the great conversation around this topic (and shared binding tradition) that helped me refine this topic.
The article above originally appeared in the Guild of Book Workers Newsletter, no. 283, December 2025.
- Mesmer, Renate. “Edelpappband“. Handout from Standards presentation. Portland October 26th-30th 2005.
- Verheyen, Peter D. “Millimeter Binding / Edelpappband”. The Bonefolder: an e-journal for the bookbinder and book artist. Vol. 1, No. 2 (2005).
- Verheyen, Peter D. “Disbinding Bradel“. Pressbengel Project Blog. Three parts series including “who was Bradel?”, tracing the technique via the German literature, tutorial for early 19th century style.
- “Die Berechtigung des Pappbandes“, in Archiv für Buchbinderei. Halle a. S. : W. Knapp, Vol. 6 1906-1907 (pp. 131-133)
- Ibid
- “Der Pappband im Gewande unserer Zeit“. Archiv für Buchbinderei, Halle a. S. : W. Knapp, Vol. 9 1909-1910 (pg. 86-89)
- Brade, L[udwig]. Illustriertes Buchbinderbuch ... . Halle a. S. : W. Knapp, 1904 (pg. 157)
- Kersten, Paul. "Der Pappband ..." Archiv für Buchbinderei, Halle a. S. : W. Knapp, Vol. 9. 1909-1910 (pp. 109-111)
- Growoll, A. The Profession Of Bookselling: A Handbook of Practical Hints for the Apprentice and Bookseller. New York: The Office of Publishers’ Weekly, 1895. (pg 107)
- Collin, Ernst. Der Pressbengel. Berlin: Euphorion Verlag, 1922. (pp. 20-21) Translated as The Bone Folder by Peter D. Verheyen in various editions 2009 - 2017. See all in left sidebar here on the Pressbengel Project.
- Nitz, Hermann. Aus einem reichen Buchbinderleben, [Berlin]: [Graefe], [1951]. (pp 36-37) Nitz was one of the most technically innovative binders in Germany, blurring the lines between hand- and trade binding. For more on one of his innovations, see the Kombinationseinband here.
- Schramm, Albert (ed). Taschenbuch für Büchersammler. Munich: Verlag der Münchner Drucke, 1927. (pg. 113)
Pressbengel Project blog posts on the topic.
"A Justification for the Pappband”. [Paul Adam, editorial voice of AfB]: Describes the development of the Pappband as sort of an austerity binding that was developed out of the Seven Years War with the structure based on that of the parchment binding; but instead of lacing slips through, these were frayed out and pasted to the inside of the [adhered] boards. Notes that “back then” binders reinforced at head/tail/corners with parchment, and made cutouts for these at the head/tail turn-ins by the spine. Describes how binders made their own decorated papers. Robustness of structures if gebrochene Rücken made of good folder stock, but also notes development of 3-piece ands case bindings.
Also, "in recent times there have been increased efforts to create an artistic Pappband, but says that these are an aesthetic diversion as the bindings are doomed to fail due to inherent vices, and while straightforward, only robust when covered in cloth on the spine. Therefore, a call to go back to the roots and cover the Pappband [structure] in parchment, also because the increasingly [expensive] decorated papers deserve better …"
![]() |
| Page from article describing reinforced Pappband. Note: Image goes with another article. |
"Der Pappband im Gewande unserer Zeit". Archiv für Buchbinderei, Halle a. S. : W. Knapp, v.9, 1909-1910 (pg. 86-89) [Paul Adam, editorial voice of AfB]
Sort of continuation of previous article: Against paper covered, for cloth covered (still a Pappband structurally). also mentioned cartonnage Bradel. Structure foundational to several adaptations and variants. Covering head/tail at spine and corners with parchment not logical and technically sound … Historically grounded in gebrochener Rücken, ‘ur-form’ creation described (with diagrams) with evolution to spine stiffener on strong paper ... Describes backing, spine and adhered boards or case creation, Covering. Also covering spine in cloth; taking strip out of the covering paper middle, trimming minimally at both sides to account for grooves; adhering sides; then strip from center in width of spine. It's not really an Edelpappband, is it? Let the debate continue.![]() |
| Advertisement from the Börsenblatt (June 12, 1926) for an Edelpappband with cloth reinforcements are described in the above image. |
Kersten, Paul. "Der Pappband". Archiv für Buchbinderei, Halle a. S. : W. Knapp, v.9 1909-1910 (pp. 109-111)
A "reply“ to previous article; described Bradel as a "luxurious" half-cloth binding in France, not something more than a broshure; Pappband with cloth spine not a Pappband, instead half-cloth; Pappband not durable [bindings in many libraries beg to differ]; describes how head/tail; spine and corner reinforcements of parchment [or cloth/leather] are logical and sound; visibility of parchment in areas of highest wear/vulnerability has marketing value demonstrating that stronger and worth extra cost. Acknowledges case-binding easier and more efficient, but with adhered boards the spine piece fits tighter to spine of book, better for tooling title. Concludes by saying that he is not trying to be difficult, but …
Editorial rebuttal (probably by Adam) follows article: More on Bradel, term only in use since 1870 [wrong, see le Normand) but since Alscace and Lorraine were taken in 1870/71 … ok], a cloth covered Pappband no longer a Pappband; extra cost in labor vis-à-vis even half-cloth still hard to justify; better fit of adhered-boards dependent on binder’s skill, not structure; a “modernized” Pappband still behind the times, “what would English binders think when they saw/handled them and read this debate.
![]() |
| Excerpt from "Der Pappband ...." with part of [Adam's] rebuttal. Note: Image goes with another article. |
![]() |
| The Pappband, and by extension Edelpappband in Der Pressbengel. |
![]() |
| The Pappband in Kersten's Buchbinderlehrling, 1923. |
![]() |
| Morf (1930, 1951. [1926] identical). |
![]() |
| Detail with "4." |
![]() |
| Edelpappbanddecke in Wiese. The first illustration as a case, not adhered-boards. |
![]() |
| The Edelpappband in Luers. |
![]() |
| The Edelpappband in Fröde. |
![]() |
| Rhein (1953). |
![]() |
| Encouragement to experiment with placement of the reinforcements. Rhein (1953). |
![]() |
| Pappband reinforcements in Henningsen. |
![]() |
| Text above image describes making the turn-in cuts at head and tail of spine. |
![]() |
| Edelpappband from Wiese, pp. 214-215. |
First serialized in Das Falzbein, 1949-56.
![]() |
| "Reinforced" Pappband from Moessner. |
Describes the Edelpappband (called millimeter binding) with hooked endsheets, sewn on cords, with adhered boards, and parchment reinforcement along head and tail. Structure and steps as with those described in the German literature.
"The millimeter binding was created by Henrik Park around the time of the Second World War. Park was influenced by the William Morris movement and by Cobden-Sanderson. The aesthetics were beauty and character and the tooling was in harmony to give a complete and whole appearance. Small, thin sewn paperbacks are ideal for this style of binding. The shortage of materials during the war resulted in the millimeter use of leather and vellum. In Denmark, John was the first chairman of the Henrik Park or H.P. Group for Danish design binders and bookbinders."
Instructions for adhered-boards variant.
Instructions for case-bound variant.













.jpg)

,%20Archiv%20f%C3%BCr%20Buchbinderei,%201931.jpg)









